NAVAIR Seeks Support to Integrate LRASM Anti-Ship Missile on B-52

NAVAIR Begins B-52 LRASM Integration Effort

Naval Air Systems Command published a presolicitation notice on October 7, 2026, for integration and test support intended to bring the AGM-158C Long Range Anti-Ship Missile to the B-52H Stratofortress.

NAVAIR plans to negotiate a sole-source, Cost Plus Fixed Fee delivery order with Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control under an existing Basic Ordering Agreement. Proposed work includes missile software updates, testing, test-asset repairs and failure review boards. The command identified Lockheed Martin as LRASM’s sole designer, developer, manufacturer and integrator.

The notice is an early acquisition step rather than a fielding announcement. It provides no contract value, certification schedule or confirmed B-52 missile loadout, and the government is not committed to making an award.

Part of a Wider B-52 Modernization

LRASM integration would form part of an extensive B-52 modernization effort. In September 2026, the Air Force said weapons work includes the latest LRASM and Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile variants. The bomber is also receiving new radar, communications and propulsion systems intended to keep it operationally relevant into the 2050s.

Integration will require more than physically mounting the missile. The bomber’s weapons-management architecture, launch equipment, mission systems, safety logic and LRASM software must function together as a complete system.

LRASM is based heavily on the AGM-158 JASSM family architecture already associated with the B-52. The bomber can carry eight AGM-158-family JASSMs internally on its Conventional Rotary Launcher and another 12 externally. Although that makes a large LRASM load technically conceivable, NAVAIR has not disclosed or confirmed a carriage number.

Maritime Strike Role

LRASM is designed for long-range attacks against high-threat maritime targets while reducing reliance on persistent intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, network links and GPS in contested electronic-warfare conditions. An equipped B-52 could launch stand-off weapons outside the densest portions of hostile air defenses while contributing missile capacity to joint attacks involving submarines, surface ships, tactical aircraft and land-based forces.

The missile’s autonomy does not eliminate the need for a wider targeting network. Mobile naval forces must still be detected, identified and located accurately enough to place weapons in the correct area. Effective employment would therefore depend on supporting assets such as space-based sensors, maritime patrol aircraft, submarines, unmanned systems and tactical aviation.

Bomber Fleet Transition

The B-1B became the first Air Force bomber to achieve early operational capability with LRASM in 2018. Adding the weapon to the B-52 could preserve heavy-bomber maritime strike capacity as the service moves toward a future fleet centered on the rebuilt B-52 and next-generation B-21 while retiring legacy aircraft.

The B-2’s use of LRASM during a live-fire sinking exercise north of the Mariana Islands in June 2026 also reflects the growing counter-maritime role of long-range bombers.

Indo-Pacific Operations and Constraints

The B-52’s range could allow maritime-strike sorties from dispersed locations rather than relying exclusively on Guam. Potential operating points include other Pacific facilities, Alaska, Hawaii, Australia and the continental United States, depending on political access, mission requirements and tanker support. Pacific Air Forces already uses Bomber Task Force deployments to operate strategic bombers from varied overseas and U.S. locations.

The value of an expanded launch force will also depend on missile inventories and production capacity. Sustained operations would require sufficient LRASM, JASSM and related stand-off weapon stocks for repeated salvos while supporting other platforms and theaters. Targeting quality, resilient bases, communications and tanker availability would remain additional operational constraints.