Saudi Oil Tanker Struck Near Jizan as Houthis Claim Attack

Saudi Tanker Struck Near Jizan

Yemen’s Iran-aligned Houthi movement has claimed attacks on two Saudi oil tankers, while Saudi authorities have confirmed that at least one vessel was struck near the port of Jizan on the southern Red Sea coast.

The Saudi-flagged Encelia was hit near the port’s outer approaches, causing a fire near its bow. The crew was reported safe, the tanker was secured, and no environmental damage was initially reported.

A maritime-security source said the vessel issued a distress call reporting that it had been hit by a missile and was on fire. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center received a report of a tanker struck by an unidentified projectile in the same general area, with its crew fighting an onboard fire.

Saudi Arabia confirmed the incident but did not initially identify the attacker. The Houthis separately claimed responsibility.

Second Claimed Attack Unconfirmed

The Houthis said they targeted the Encelia and another Saudi-flagged tanker, the Layla, using ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and drones. The group said the vessels were attacked for violating its declared blockade against Saudi ports.

No comparable distress call, damage report or official Saudi confirmation concerning the Layla had emerged at the time of reporting. One tanker strike has therefore been confirmed, while the claimed second attack remains unverified.

The Houthis also claimed that about 10 vessels had been forced to turn back because of the blockade. That figure has not been independently confirmed.

Blockade Moves Beyond Warnings

The Encelia incident appears to be the first confirmed use of force directly associated with the Houthis’ recently declared blockade of Saudi Arabia.

The group had warned shipping companies against loading or discharging cargo at Saudi ports and said vessels could remain targets after leaving the immediate Red Sea region. Several tankers subsequently changed course, including vessels carrying Saudi crude near Bab el-Mandeb and others reportedly redirecting toward the Suez Canal.

The confirmed strike indicates that ships approaching Saudi Red Sea facilities may face risks beyond the narrow Bab el-Mandeb chokepoint. The attack’s location near Jizan could require operators to assess threats across a wider part of the southern Red Sea.

Pressure on Alternative Oil Routes

The Strait of Hormuz remains the principal maritime front in the U.S.–Iran war, with traffic reduced amid Iranian threats, attacks, naval warnings and continuing U.S. strikes.

Saudi Arabia has increasingly used its east–west pipeline to move oil from fields near the Persian Gulf to the Red Sea port of Yanbu, allowing some exports to bypass Hormuz. Attacks near Saudi Red Sea ports or along routes through Bab el-Mandeb could weaken that alternative without requiring either waterway to be physically closed.

Sustained risk could raise insurance and freight costs, delay deliveries and encourage longer voyages around Africa. Hormuz is the main outlet for Persian Gulf oil and liquefied natural gas, while Bab el-Mandeb links the Indian Ocean with the Red Sea and Suez Canal.

Scale of Campaign Remains Unclear

It is not yet known whether the Encelia strike was an isolated action or the start of a sustained Houthi campaign. Saudi Arabia has not announced a major military response, and the United States has not detailed whether it will treat the attack as part of the broader conflict with Iran.

Repeated attacks could increase pressure for stronger naval escorts, expanded air defenses, or military action against Houthi launch sites. Such measures could place additional demands on forces already operating around Hormuz and increase the risk of direct involvement by Saudi Arabia and the United States.

For now, the available evidence establishes one confirmed tanker strike linked by the Houthis to their blockade declaration. The claimed attack on the Layla, the campaign’s duration, and its broader effect on commercial shipping remain unresolved.